Which of the following is NOT a measure to reduce barriers for disabled athletes in sport?

• A. Wider variety of activities available in schools
• B. Increased number of coaches specialized for disabled athletes
• C. Open competitions where disabled and able-bodied athletes can enter as a pair
• D. Regular anti-doping rules in place

Answer: (D)

The main idea here is removing obstacles that stop disabled athletes from taking part in sport. Offering a wider range of activities gives more options that can fit different abilities, so participation isn’t limited by a lack of suitable choices. Having more coaches specialized for disabled athletes means they get the right guidance, adaptations, and support to train effectively, which directly reduces skill and access barriers. Open competitions where disabled and able-bodied athletes can join together fosters inclusion and reduces social and logistical barriers by creating shared opportunities.

Regular anti-doping rules are essential for fair and safe competition, but they don't directly address access, inclusion, or the practical barriers disabled athletes face. They apply to all competitors and concern governance and integrity, not the accessibility of sport. So, this option isn’t a measure to reduce barriers for disabled athletes.