Which of the following is NOT a stated benefit of integrating disability games with normal games?

• A. Increased social acceptability of disabled people
• B. Increase in number of role models in media
• C. Increased participation in sport
• D. Universal free access to all facilities

Answer: (A)

Introducing disability games alongside normal games aims to bring people into sport and make events more inclusive. The most direct, tangible benefits you’d expect to see are more participants competing because opportunities are visible and accessible, more disabled athletes serving as role models in media and at events, and improvements in access or support for participation through policies or programmes. Universal free access to all facilities isn’t something automatically produced by integrating games; it requires separate funding and policy choices beyond the integration itself. Increased social acceptability is a broader societal change that can happen over time, but it isn’t a direct, guaranteed outcome listed as a specific benefit of the integration.